I suspect that this is the direct result of AI generated content just overwhelming any real content.

I tried ddg, google, bing, quant, and none of them really help me find information I want these days.

Perplexity seems to work but I don’t like the idea of AI giving me “facts” since they are mostly based on other AI posts

  • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 hours ago

    It’s not just you. At some point, search’s primary purpose went from “finding the information you’re looking for” to “getting paid to put links in front of you”. Then they kept iterating on it, quarter by quarter, for a very long time.

  • DancingBear@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    The other day I googled how long should I broil a ribeye steak and the google AI told me to broil it for 45 minutes.

    Broil is the hottest setting on the oven and you’re supposed to broil the meat as close to the burner as possible. This would probably burn down your house.

    • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Huh…Can’t replicate that claim (though I would believe it happening)

      On the 20th Sep. I asked my Google Home if it would be raining.
      It responded that it would rain. I asked when it would rain.
      Home responded with “Today it won’t rain.”

      Like what? 5 seconds ago you said it would. No weather report reports rain. Where did you get the first response from??
      And I could even replicate it (have it on video)

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I can’t get it to repeat it either but it was definitely an ai auto response thing from google ai overview or whatever it’s called

        Now it’s giving distance from burner and everything lol. It’s learning 👀

  • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    The whole internet is in the process of being filled with garbage content. Search engines are bad but also there’s not much good content left to find (in % of the total)

  • SapphironZA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Its not AIs fault, its advertising based SEOs fault. Search has been broken for years for many topics.

    • bitjunkie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      And the AI is trained on the shitty search results. It just parses them many times faster than a human reader can, which does at least make it better at getting to the fucking point. Once paid advertising is fully integrated with LLM, it will be as shitty and useless as traditional search. And then the entire world will collectively hop to the next trend so it can get hyper-monetized/enshittified, too.

  • stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I’ve been trying to use ddg and I just find it infuriating that it never finds what I need, especially if I’m looking for local information about something. Google seems to always prioritize those types of results when I need them (probably because it makes it easier to sell me something).

  • Zink@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    My experience is that search engines are still decent at finding niche information that would normally be hard to find. But for anything mainstream, for instance any household product that should be easy to find information about, instead how about these 300 pages of top 10 lists of Amazon affiliate links buried under AI generated filler?

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    There’s an extension that filters out websites from every engine. So like when you see Quora or other other digital garbage in your result, block it once and you’ll never see another Quora article again.

    Idr the name of the extension - I’ll check when I get home and follow up.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    9 hours ago

    It is, and it’s not just the search engines to blame.

    The content out there is incredibly spammy. It doesn’t pay to create good content. It pays to make a pool of AI gunge based on what people search for and then stick ads on it.

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Spam sites laden with key words and massive SEO to farm advertising dollars from clicks long predated AI

      It doesnt help that big search engines like google have realized people will go as far as page 2 or 3 to find the results, so intentionally worsen their search results to increase ads being served.

  • Voroxpete
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    11 hours ago

    It’s not just you. Search got worse, and it did so intentionally.

    Ed Zitron lays it all out really well, with all the receipts, but the basic version is this; Google has an incentive to make you search more for the same things, because then they can show you more ads. And google is, first and foremost, an ad delivery company. Every “product” they own is an ad delivery vehicle. It’s not just AI slop that made search based; Google made search bad, and everyone else followed suit, to a greater or lesser degree.

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’m going to be honest with you. They feel no worse today than they have for the past ~5+ years or so. SEO blog spam with a dozen paragraphs to tell you exactly one line of information have been around for quite a while. Many of these articles felt generated either from crappy writers or “AI” tools predating the LLMs we have now.

  • catastrophicblues@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’ve found that using Kagi, then DDG, then Google always gets me the results I need. But 95% of the time, Kagi gets it.

  • Varyk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    121
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    17 hours ago

    they’re pretty bad, but ddg at least feels like I’m getting actual results.

    • Fizz@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah DDG is great. The only thing I find is its not good at local results but a quick !g on the end gets me the local results im looking for.

        • Lvxferre@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Redirects your search to Google. You can put it anywhere in the search; for example !g how do i shot web, how do i shot web !g and how do i !g shot web will all land you into Google.

          There are other 13k (yup) bangs like this. Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Yahoo, Quora, most gaming wikis, etc. A few sites (like Google and Bing) have multiple bangs, that land you directly into a specific page (e.g. !bv searches Bing videos). More info here.

        • zante@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          14 hours ago

          If you’re using ddg without !bangs - you’re only having half the fun.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        oh, good tip. I didn’t know about that.

        you tack !g to the end of whatever the resulting search URL is?

        • reev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Can be anywhere in the search.

          “cute dogs !g” “!g cute dogs” “cute !g dogs”

          Those all work the same, though clearly one is more cursed than the others. They have those for a bunch of other sites as well, for example if you want to search YouTube specifically/directly you can use !yt but I can’t kick the habit of just going to those sites first and then searching directly on there.

      • MTK@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s how I felt until about a month ago, now ddg is really useless

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      I prefer DDG, but I hate the news search. 90% of the results are paywalled.

      Oh, and sometimes the image search will return a pile of porn for a seemingly clean search request. I once searched for “R34 Skyline” expecting Nissans, and got VERY different results without safe search.

      • ProstheticBrain
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        R34 is also short for rule 34 - “if it exists, there’s porn of it on the internet”

        So if you search R34 and anything, you’ll get porn.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        News orgs clinging to tradition.

        i use archive.is for anything I really want to read.

        most news is fluffy bullshit anyway.

        • zante@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Agree. It’s an important part of media literacy these days.

          For political news, I’m only interested in what was actually said, not what is reported to be said .

        • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          15 hours ago

          It’s just that Bing/DDG seem to promote news from these sites as if they’re sponsored links… but without the disclosure.

          • Varyk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            bummer.

            I see all the labeled sponsored links on Bing, but I generally get high quality results outside of those.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        is it? that kind of makes sense, because I still use Bing occasionally while Google is completely out of rotation, although I don’t find Bing as good as duckduckgo.

        edit: it is not! looks like the DuckDuckGo search engine is an aggregate of hundreds of search engines, including their own duck duck bot, excluding Google but including some Bing results.

        • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Their FAQ hems and haws about that, but (in the past) I’ve done side-by-side tests and found identical results. Maybe something’s changed, maybe it hasn’t.

          • Varyk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            15 hours ago

            it must have done by now, then, I get different results from identical prompts in DuckDuckGo and Bing although both are usually relevant.

            “DuckDuckGo’s results are a compilation of “over 400” sources according to itself, including Bing, Yahoo! Search BOSS, Wolfram Alpha, Yandex, and its own web crawler (the DuckDuckBot); but none from Google.”

            are you having trouble finding something specifically or you just don’t like the quality of the search results you’re finding in general?

            definitely if you’re still on Google, stop using it.

            It’s completely useless at this point.