• Aksamit@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Euthanasia. Access to free and humane end of life services should be a fundamental human right for all adults everywhere.

  • vga@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    For adults, literally everything that doesn’t directly hurt other living things.

    • abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      To play some devils advocate here, this is still a very sensitive subject. Not because the kids don’t have a right to that care but because kids are kids, and things can change drastically for them as they grow. For every kid who genuinely needs that care, there is another who doesn’t but is searching to discover themselves. Some forms of affirming care are safer than others, but others can have drastic life long effects on growing people. Unfortunately there are also some parents that will force care (or lack thereof) on kids in one way or another.

      I think that therapy and understanding should be promoted heavily for kids so they can identify and understand how they feel and why, but blanket statements are challenging because they can be very easily spun (ex. All the “the left wants to force drugs on kids” bullshit that gets spouted.)

      Not saying that I’m right or that you’re wrong, but I think this is a discussion that still has to be opened/presented further for it to gain traction in the public eye.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Excuse me, Mx. “Devil’s Advocate,” but nothing you said is contradictory to/incompatible with providing gender affirming care to children. In fact, therapy and understanding/acceptance are a major part of that.

        The biggest issue I have is that trans children’s needs and well-being are thrown under the bus to save the small minority of genuinely confused cis people. Given the current state of their rights, any argument for waiting until some more idealized treatment arrives is an argument against trans rights and our entire community’s well-being.

      • styxem
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        More give doctors the right to treat their patients

    • vga@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Gonna have to disagree with you for two reasons:

      • it’s not actually illegal (except in Australia soon I guess)
      • when everyone’s a user, the social aspect makes it practically impossible for single households to impose limits without making their child a pariah
      • redwattlebird@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Fair, not yet but the bill has passed and it’s now being written into law in Australia, where I live. I agree that it’ll be difficult for the child to be the odd one out if most people in society are doing something that they’re banned from doing at home but when has that stopped society from progressing? Why teach to cave into societal pressure when you can apply critical thinking as to why it’s being limited in the first place?

  • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Dumpster diving. Doesn’t matter if it’s food or merchandise. It should be illegal to lock a dumpster or willfully destroy usable goods.

    • Bahnd Rollard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Locking dumpsters is important in some areas so wild life dosen’t get into them. To quote the National Parks service,

      “There is a significant overlap between the intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest humans”.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        3 days ago

        Most businesses lock the dumpsters because trash service is expensive, and if you don’t lock them people will pull up with a pickup bed full of trash and fill them up.

    • MintyFresh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      You’ve never had to repeatedly clean trash slurry off of a concrete slab because junkies are terrible people who have no manners. If people could be trusted to not redistribute the trash across the land I wouldn’t mind so much

    • socsa@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Dumpster diving laws are more about trespassing and removing liability anyway.

  • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    110
    ·
    3 days ago

    Sleeping in a car that you own.

    I think there should be restrictions on where to park for this, but in general people found sleeping in cars should be protected by the law against theft and harassment.

    • Agent641@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Restrictions on where you can park

      Nah fuck that noise. This is how you let them corral you into slums.

      Park where you want. Out front of parliament, the prime minister’s house, on the street out front a billionaires house, wherever. If they don’t like it, them they should fix it.

      • Usernameblankface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Well, I mean, someone’s evil ex shouldn’t park in front of their house. And people should not park for a nap in a handicap spot. And not in the driving portion of a road, not in the breakdown lane of a major highway, not on anyone’s lawn.

        But yeah, basically any place where parking is allowed, sleeping while parked should be allowed and protected.

        • gothic_lemons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          All of those places already have laws preventing those. Don’t need a special one for no sleep in car in those instances

          • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            It is. It is a good place to park. That’s not what is being discussed.

            Having a place to live is an unmitigable human need. Having a car is not. A car left too long on public land should become a shelter for OTHERS.

            • Apathy Tree@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              3 days ago

              I think you might have missed something in your zeal, which is fine. We need more passion about such things. Just directed the right way.

              But the point being made before your comment was that anyone should be allowed to sleep -at least in their own- car, which you seem to agree with. And any public parking places where a car can sleep should be fine for a human to also sleep within said car, which you also seem to agree with.

              This isn’t about having a car or not, and its not really about sleeping in a car you find, it’s about how it’s used if it is owned by the person who wants to use it that’s being discussed. So if someone already owns a car and wants or needs to live out of it, we can agree that’s ok (everyone involved in this thread is agreeing here). And if there’s a place that is appropriate for cars to be whether anyone is in them or not, that place should be fine with people sleeping as well. (Pretty sure everyone is agreeing with that, too)

              So, everyone agrees, yay! No need to condescend when everyone agrees with you :)

              If you want to expand the topic to shelter wherever you find it, that’s a great conversation to have. It’s just not actually the one being had.

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 days ago

      Sleeping anywhere. It should be illegal to wake somebody up, unless there’s reason to believe they require medical intervention.

      • JeezNutz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Waking someone up being illegal is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard

        • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          It is illegal to wake up children who are napping in childcare. Sleeping is a fundamental need, and waking somebody is akin to grabbing their sandwich and throwing it on the ground.

          • JeezNutz@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            Waking up an adult is really different from waking up a kid. It should only be illegal if it’s being done repeatedly and purposely to someone who’s just sleeping and not at the detriment of anyone else. (Unless they asked them too)

            • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I mean sure there are specific instances where waking somebody makes sense. On transit if you know their stop or the end of the line. If they are in danger. If they are covered in vomit or if they wet themselves. But otherwise, you can’t leave it to law enforcement to make humane decisions so don’t give them the choice.

              Just imagine like a really nice town and an old retired guy who fell asleep on a park bench with a good book. Not in danger, not bothering anyone, don’t wake him.

              The same dignity applies to a junkie who is passed out on the lawn. This could be his only quality sleep in the past 20 hours. You don’t know if somebody asleep has narcolepsy. You don’t know how much they need it. But they do need it or they’d be awake.

              Again it’s a need not a want. Deprivation of sleep is a torture technique. Police officers are using it legally without repercussion right now. I’m saying, it should be considered a form of assault and/or harassment under the law. It is an act of violence. And it’s not right.

              • JeezNutz@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I mean, in the examples you gave it would be hard to tell the difference between them sleeping and having a medical emergency. If I saw some junkie looking dude unconscious on his lawn I would probably check on him. If you fall asleep in a public place it shouldn’t be expected of other people to not wake you.

      • cum@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Agreed. Hope you got room in your bed cuz I’m joining you tonight.

    • cum@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t think it’s illegal, but rather where you park can make it illegal.

      • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        In the US, it depends on the State or municipality. I’ve slept in my car plenty of times while traveling, although it was often in parking garages and out of sight, so maybe I just got lucky. It will really depend on how uptight the town or store manager is. I’ve heard that RVs are generally welcome at Walmarts, so I’d like to heard the logic on why RV are ok to sleep in but not cars.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      The shady part is that most people who get bothered for sleeping in their cars is because they’re doing it somewhere on private property.

      Other than that, fully agree.

  • Kalkaline @leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    3 days ago

    Abortion. No specific circumstances needed. If a woman wants an abortion, it should be allowed. There is no one getting late term abortions that didn’t want the child and something tragic happened and now they need one.

    • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      3 days ago

      As a caveat to the last sentence, it’s definitely possible for women to not know they’re pregnant until very late in the process. There have even been women who only found out they were pregnant when they went into labor.

      • tdgoodman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 days ago

        I know a family that had 6 hours of pregnancy, and they, like most in the same situation, did not seek a late term abortion. By the time labor sets in, the fetus is developed enough to survive outside the womb, so anyone seeking to end the pregnancy without taking possession of a child, should be allowed to simply demand that the fetus be removed. It should be up to the medical staff to decide how.

  • Femcowboy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    3 days ago

    Prostitution. Keeping it illegal makes it so much worse for everyone involved except human traffickers.

      • vulgarcynic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        I love the idea of someone being brought up for tax evasion charges because they were only claiming a blowjob rate when they were doing anal.

        This could be the most interesting audit in the history of the IRS.

        • Aceticon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          In my country, to crack down on tax evasion by small businesses people can give their tax payer number when they buy something (say food at a restaurant) and a copy of the receipt automatically gets passed on to the taxman (there’s a lottery on those and people can get some money from it, which is how the State incentivises people to do this, plus you can get some tax discounts on some kinds of expenses such as medicine).

          All this to say that the idea of the taxman getting a copy of an itemized receipt for sex work services is just delicious.

          PS: Around here sex work is unregulated, meaning not illegal (though profiting of other people’s sex work is illegal) but not explicitly legal and regulated.

  • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    3 days ago

    Euthanasia/medically assisted suicide.

    The cruelty to force people to stay alive while slowly dying and suffering with terminal diseases is horrible. It’s traumatic for everyone involved, and it’s pointless.