• FinishingDutch@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        ·
        10 months ago

        God yes, all the time. Navigation was more of an art than a science back then. And you have to imagine you’re flying quite high to avoid flak, while looking out for targets that might be obscured by cloud cover and where the lights were turned off so as not to present a clear target for said bombers.

        Basically, the crew dropping the bombs might be ‘reasonably certain’ they’re hitting the right target, but a few miles here or there can make a lot of difference. You think you’re looking at A, while you’re really flying over B.

        I live in the Netherlands, right on the German border. A local village here was bombed by accident on february 15th 1945, because the bomber crew mistook it for a German industrial complex just over the border. They dropped 35 bombs. They luckily ‘only’ killed 2 and injured 7. There’s a yearly memorial.

        It’s terrible that it happened, but honestly… you really can’t blame the crew for it.

        • Squirrelsdrivemenuts@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes, Nijmegen got hit almost as bad as Rotterdam (the worst bombing by the germans) and that was also because of allied forces thinking they were flying over germany. It was the 80 year memorial a few weeks ago. Unfortunately, more than a few people died in Nijmegen.

        • merc
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          Especially with night bombing campaigns.

          They used to “move” towns by a few km by stringing up lights that matched the pattern of the town’s streetlamps in empty fields a few km away, and then having the actual city blacked out. From 30k feet up, they’d see matching light patterns and assume they were over the target.

          The daylight bombing raids were a bit more accurate. You may think that being able to match a map to terrain features sounds relatively easy in a plane that’s flying relatively slowly along a predictable route. But if it’s at all overcast it’s much harder. Then add in flak or enemy fighters distracting you and pulling you away from your maps, and suddenly it’s a lot harder.

          But, under ideal conditions, with the Norden bomb sight, the bombers could be surprisingly accurate. The bomb sight adjusted for ground speed, changing winds, and included a primitive auto-pilot and actually steered the plane, and AFAIK it auto-released the bombs at the right time. Hitting the right cluster of buildings from a height of 30k feet with a gravity bomb is fairly impressive. But, under combat conditions that was pretty rare.

      • F04118F@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        41
        ·
        10 months ago

        Navigating at night using nothing but maps, compass, altitude and speed indicator is pretty difficult. Especially when the hostile territory you are flying over is forcing everyone to keep their curtains closed and minimize light leaks.

        • Captain Aggravated
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’ve done some night flying by dead reckoning. I had the benefit of meteorologists in the territory I was flying over, so I had pretty good winds aloft data. That makes a DIFFERENCE.

      • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        10 months ago

        Some cities would go dark and then a mile away have lanterns set up in the night over a large distance so planes would drop their bombs in a field instead of over the actual city, if I recall correctly.

        • mindbleach
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Or landed in. See giant stone marking spelling out EIRE, i.e., NOT ENGLAND YOU STUPID YANKEE.

          • gravitas_deficiency
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            To wit: the initial “development” process of the Tu-4

            Edit: ok to be fair those were more of a “don’t have enough fuel” situation, but it is funny how they just copied the thing

        • Deceptichum
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          I was going to make a joke about how it was really because they were hiding Nazi gold but…

          Although these bombings were attributed to error, some historians have suspected that the Allies wanted to send a warning to Switzerland for having collaborated with Germany.

        • EmoDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          The German city of Constanze would deliberately leave all their lights on at night so that allied pilots would think they were part of Switzerland

          This actually worked pretty well

  • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    10 months ago

    I thought the first one was gonna be “precision bombing then,” and the second was gonna be “precision bombing now” with a consumer drone being flown by Vasylyi dropping a hand grenade through the hatchway of a tank from 150 feet up.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      been seeing lots of footage of them flying right into hatches of bmps and t90s. really makes me wonder why the orks aren’t buttoned up / closing their hatches on exit more.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        They’re abandoning the vehicles, they probably don’t care or comprehend why they should.

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        If you’re abandoning a tank, there’s a good chance you’re worried about being sniped. Taking the time to close the hatch leaves you as a sitting duck, while doing it. They are likely jumping out and running to cover.

        • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          If you’re abandoning a tank, there’s a good chance you’re worried about being sniped.

          learn that at ft benning huh? home of the armor school?

          No you didn’t. because that’s… something you just assumed in your head.

          these chucklefucks getting blasted in Ukraine have a lot more to worry from mine and rpg toting quad copters than their TC getting sniped in the turret.

          sniping tank commanders would actually be living on hard mode because if the russians have ANYTHING with IR, it’ll be their more advanced BMPs and t72s/t90s. so you take your pot shot, then they slew around, find your hot spot, and start putting autocannon rounds around you. not a smart tactic.

          you don’t waste snipers attacking tanks. why do I even bother replying…