• Fugtig Fisk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1302 months ago

    This is why we dont have cool things any more… we make up our own knowledge just because it seems to fit

    • @zarkanian
      link
      262 months ago

      Acronyms didn’t become popular until fairly recently, so if the word is at least a century old, odds are that it isn’t an acronym.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      112 months ago

      But when I take a brake, doesn’t that mean I’m stopping work, hitting the brakes?

      When I diffuse a situation, doesn’t that mean I’m thinning out the tension or whatever?

      People make up whatever reason they need to avoid going to a dictionary to understand what they’re writing.

      (It’s break and defuse, in case anyone was wondering. The first doesn’t need explanation, but defuse is because you want to cut the fuse off from the thing that’s going to blow up, the thing being the situation)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -6
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      This is why we don’t have nice things… we rather think that an incorrect statement from a random unknown person on the internet comes from someone lazy or nefarious, that from someone just making a joke.

      I think it is funny to think of ‘NEWS’ as a abbreviation, why else would so many news media print it in capitals.

      • Fugtig Fisk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 months ago

        The way the internet works, people have no chance to know if you’re kidding or being serious. It takes one misunderstanding, to turn a distribution of a joke into distribution of misinformation

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -32 months ago

          Sure. However there is a difference between “NEWS is a acroym for something” and much more hurtful and/or political/commercial motivated spread of misinformation.

          • Fugtig Fisk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            62 months ago

            Any misinformation is imo a problem, no matter if it is intentional, unintentional, hurtful or innocent

            Its the practise of misinformation that i find dangerous, no matter what its about. I understand that misinformation can be funny though, but it must clearly show that it is a joke

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        92 months ago

        Oops. Should I not have done that? I mean if anyone had told me that sort of thing is frowned upon I never would’ve…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          152 months ago

          They’re joking. You should actually always eat while shitting and shit while eating. No exceptions.

          • Cadeillac
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            That’s what the nice shelf is for on the toilet

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              62 months ago

              My housemate at university used to eat a bowl of cereal while on the toilet in the morning. We referred to it as “the circle of life”.

              • Cadeillac
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 months ago

                I’d be mad as fuck lmao. You wanna talk about someone pissing in your cheerios, I hope you eat fast.

            • J'Pol
              link
              fedilink
              52 months ago

              Where else are you supposed to put your comic book and chocolate milk?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        32 months ago

        Why would I do extra research to prove my professor wrong instead of just listening to what they said for the test? Idk you’re right but also assuming a lot lmfao

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 months ago

          Journalism is the production and distribution of reports on the interaction of events, facts, ideas, and people that are the “news of the day” and that informs society to at least some degree of accuracy.

          Gosh, I dunno. Couldn’t have anything to do with the subject matter, maybe?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s also the reporting of facts and the fact is that I was told in school that is where it came from, which is what I originally said. I didn’t scour book and the internet over every claim every teacher said. My bad. But yes they still taught research? What a crazy thing to ask

            It’s also about accepting new information when you’re wrong. Which I have done. But you didn’t have to come at it the way you did? You can inform someone they are wrong without being hostile about it. How hard is it to say “hey actually that is incorrect” and then post snopes without being a dick?That’s reddit behavior.

            Edit: thought I was replying to person who corrected me

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 months ago

              It’s ok. I was being a bit of a dick. Though I was aiming for a more sarcastic/funny(?) dick than a pedantic one. I get you though.Assuming you are of the age before the internet, we were taught long ago that authority figures were right and kids/students were wrong, and we grew into this accepting things at face value culture. Before the internet, we kind of had to as we had very little available to us (as kids) to counter what we were told.

              Anyway, that aside, back to the sarcastic dick thing, I was mostly poking at journalism as a whole. Not specifically you.

              But yeah, it’s all good.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                22 months ago

                Sorry I also replied to that when I woke up in the middle of the night to pee, so I wasn’t fully there. Not coherent enough to pick up on any sarcasm for sure.

                But it was during the internet but more in the advice animals dumb meme era. But I mainly majored in that to get my foot in the door other places. You’d be surprised, every class in every degree was reinforcing old school ethics and hammering the 24 hour networks. It was all about how to report facts without bias. Easy to make fun of now bc journalism kneels to capital but it was nothing to mock. Except my history of mass media professor I guess.

                But I wasn’t cut out for office work either way so now I’m a truck driver lmfao

        • @VirtualOdour
          link
          22 months ago

          Wait you’re sticking with that it actually happened not that you were joking? What f-tier journalism school did you go to? And they tested on the origin of the world news, already an insane thing to do to in a journalistic qualification, AND they expected a totally absurd and obviously false answer?

          Were you training to work at fox?

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            12 months ago

            I’m not gonna lie, yeah I regurgitated something they taught in an undergrad mass media history class over a decade ago. It was incorrect info and I get that.

            Again, someone could have just plainly been like “yo dude that’s not right” and I would have been like “oh okay thank you” instead of everyone being like “JOURNALISM SCHOOL LMFAO fuck this guy”

      • @Klear
        link
        12 months ago

        That’s news to me!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      432 months ago

      I take issue with sports being in headline news practically every day, or multiple days per week at least.

      I have nothing against people enjoying sports, but it’s a hobby like any other, which I think is unreasonably thrust upon everyone else.

      Where is the eSports news, or competitive dancing, woodworking news, or as I’m sure we can all agree on Lemmy, what about my old electronic gadget of the week news?

      When I had The Guardian app, it was quite annoying that sports was lumped in with the push notifications for actual news.

      I’m just saying sports news ought to be opt-in like any other hobby.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        122 months ago

        I agree. I can’t stand that every restaurant or bar has to have a TV or 20 that are all tuned to talking heads blowing hot air over what sports guy #876,914 did last night, or what sports guy #1,456,888 will do tomorrow night.

        Even when it’s live sports, the broadcast is still more commercials than game, every square inch of the playing area is plastered with ads, plus the ads that are on the overlay, plus this instant replay is brought to you by A1 Hemorrhoid cream, from the Mega-Car Savings Plus Center, at beautiful Jack the Ambulance Chaser Stadium: “When you drive drunk, call Jack to blame on the innocent™!”

      • @5redie8
        link
        32 months ago

        I’m gonna sound like an asshole, but that stuff isn’t in there because the people reading newspapers don’t care about those things

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          I should specify, it’s in the context of tv news and other headline notifications in news apps, or front page.

          I don’t read print newspapers, and have nothing against sports being covered in any news org, as long as it’s not put front and centre where you can’t escape it haha

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        In Australia they’ve started doing horoscopes as part of the evening news. I’m not joking.

    • VindictiveJudge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      Byzantine politics did have political parties and professional sports teams as literally the same thing, so it’s not completely insane as a concept.

    • Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      3
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Also weather wasn’t part of news (as in published news) at first, unless they were reporting what it was currently doing right now, because it predated forecasting by about 300 years.

      • Schadrach
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Oh now, we’ve been predicting the weather far longer than you imagine. We just haven’t been very good at it until fairly recently.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          12 months ago

          When newspapers first started to be published they weren’t printed daily it was just whenever they felt like they had enough news. And it took days for them to create the paper and for them to print all of the copies so even very vague estimates of the weather would have been out of date by the time they were actually selling them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    422 months ago

    From the Etymonline website:

    news (n.) late 14c., “new things,” plural of new (n.) “new thing” (see new (adj.)); after French nouvelles, which was used in Bible translations to render Medieval Latin nova (neuter plural) “news,” literally “new things.”

    The English word was construed as singular at least from the 1560s, but it sometimes still was regarded as plural 17c.-19c. The odd and doubtful construction probably accounts for the absurd folk-etymology (attested by 1640 but originally, and in 18c. usually, in jest-books) that claims it to be an abbreviation of north east south west, as though “information from all quarters of the compass.”

    The meaning “tidings, intelligence of something that has lately taken place” is from early 15c. The meaning “radio or television program presenting current events” is from 1923. Bad news in the extended sense of “unpleasant person or situation” is from 1926. Expression no news, good news can be traced to 1640s. Expression news to me “something I did not know” is from 1889.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      52 months ago

      Thank you! Their reply was funny, but it would have been helpful to have at least the basic definition there too if they’re going to respond to that person lol

  • @fsxylo
    link
    English
    342 months ago

    I always assumed it was news as plural. Here’s a list of new’s. This is new, that is new.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      I’m pretty sure this is the actual etymology of news.

      People asking each other “what new things?” becomes “what news”, as well as usage like “that information is new to me” becoming “that is news to me”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      It’s not only okay not to pluralize with an apostrophe, ever, but as a bonus it makes what you wrote into English.

  • I’m surprised. Merriam-Webster is usually the Urban Dictionary of print dictionaries. I’d have more expected them to change their definition because “muh common usage.”

    Hacks. OED or death.

    • HEXN3T
      link
      fedilink
      22 months ago

      Plural for “new” was my presumption as well. That means a news article can actually be called a “new”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    62 months ago

    How many people are like this? I hope it’s way less than a percent but experience tells me it’s a lot more. 😭

  • JackGreenEarth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52 months ago

    Idk if all the people in this comment section are joking, it means things that are new. New information about the world.