• ironhydroxide
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    265
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only certain thing is nobody knows who will be elected until after the polls close and counting is certified.

    VOTE. Everyone vote as if yours is the only one that matters, because it may be.

    • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      98
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      100% agree. Polls also don’t really account for voter suppression tactics, or gerrymandering and other GOP fuckery, so absolutely vote because our democracy is literally at stake here.

      Our future generations will be impacted by the outcome of this specific election.

    • proudblond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      I tend to wonder how these polls are conducted and who is answering them? Does anyone get polls via email or text? Are they still just calling people? I’m in my 40s and basically no one I know my age or younger answers numbers they don’t know anymore, and texts are ignored or flat out blocked because if you respond, they barrage you later, or at least that’s what we all assume.

      So I’m not convinced polls have any bearing on what will happen anymore. VOTE!

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yes

        Different polls with different methods.

        Many call people, some online polls (using advertising with demographic targeting), some emails to various news list subscribers, some in person polling, etc. It’s definitely harder these days to get accurate numbers because fewer responders means self imposed selection bias by those answering, which can correlate to the answers you get in unpredictable ways.

    • venusaur@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be fair, your vote statistically doesn’t matter in some states. I’ll make a bet with somebody that if I don’t vote in my state it won’t change anything.

      Dems really phoned this one in.

      • ripcord@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        There’s plenty of downticket races that potentially directly affect your life more that matter.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I don’t vote in my state it won’t change anything

        Wrong, wrong and wrong.
        Your vote matters down-ballot. Your vote matters for a mandate. Your vote matters because you will pay attention. The trick is to get people to feel the way you do so they can rule you.

        • venusaur@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          4 months ago

          You wanna make a bet? If I don’t vote, my state will still vote Harris.

          The trick is actually to trick people like you into thinking they have control when they actually don’t.

          • SeriousMite@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            I would argue that even if your state is guaranteed to go one way or the other (aside from down ballot races which are obviously very important) there’s still value in voting for president, if only to illustrate the discrepancy between the popular vote and the electoral college. The higher we run up the margins, the more it makes it obvious to everyone that we need to ditch the electoral college.

      • proudblond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Federal, maybe, but it’s still important to vote for down ticket races, and your presidential vote can at least be a statistic toward the popular vote count. I get what you mean though, I’m from a consistently blue state.

  • xmunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    That is an uncomfortably close margin but it’s good to see she’s leading now at least.

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        54
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, and it’s great to see Trump’s standing reversed in that one day!

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Better 2-pts up with Harris than 3-pts down with Biden. I like the direction those polls are swinging, even if I wouldn’t put money on an outcome.

    • paddirn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      4 months ago

      Other polls I had seen just yesterday (likely collected before Biden dropping out was a reality) still had Trump with a 1% or more lead over Harris, so they’re really all over the place and I wouldn’t trust them for much, even up to and including election day. I’m not breathing a sigh of relief until victory is declared, and even then, I wouldn’t be so sure.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is a swing and she’s only beginning to build momentum. Let’s hope things keep moving in the right direction.

    • rambling_lunatic
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      According to the article it’s within the margin of error, so Trump may have more votes.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Polls are garbage.

      The mainstream professional polls have been reliable for some time. They typically get within 2-3pt margin of error when taken a few days before the election, and they serve as a useful bellweather to track public sentiment. In this case, it appears jettisoning Biden is bringing voters back to the Dem fold. That’s what Dems were banking on, and I’d consider it a good thing given how much I don’t want Trump to be President.

      Vote like they don’t exist.

      People who obsessively follow polling are the ones most likely to vote.

      • LeadersAtWork@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Stepping aside may honestly be the single greatest show of leadership Biden has done in his lifetime. If the polls are swinging, it’s as much due to him making such a historical and respectable move as it is people surprised and refreshed by Kamala Harris.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Polls were historically accurate in 2022 and generally do a good job of measuring the temperature. Still, vote like they don’t exist.

      • jballs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        Exactly. If polls didn’t matter, Biden would still be running for president. With that being said: vote.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    65
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    4 months ago

    Harris, whose campaign says she has secured the Democratic nomination, led Trump 44% to 42% in the national poll, a difference within the 3-percentage-point margin of error.

    National polls go beyond meaninglessness and into actual harm. The national popular vote does not elect the president, as we all should know too well. My vote in Illinois is worth far less than someone’s vote in Wyoming. Your vote in California is worth far less than someone’s vote in Alaska.

    Unless a national poll weights responses based on state, and based on the electoral college results from states, it is completely misleading.

    • Moops@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      And my vote in Oklahoma…oh fuck it who are we kidding lol. Meaningless. I still do it though.

      • Irremarkable@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        4 months ago

        In a similar situation. Theres a zero percent chance trump doesn’t win my state by at least 10 points. Still gonna vote though.

        • samus12345@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          4 months ago

          He’ll see the popular vote count and it will annoy him. He was mad about it even when he won!

          • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 months ago

            Well yeah, that would be a disappointment to anyone, he lost in a popularity contest by 3 million votes to Hillary fucking Clinton. He absolutely deserves to feel bad about it and I hope he remembers every day that he wouldn’t have won if it weren’t for the electoral college.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          Both of you should be asking how your vote could be made meaningful outside the scope of your current evaluation.

        • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          This sub hates the following message. That’s why it comes today instead of yesterday.

          Focus on loyalty to ideology, not party affiliation. Left ideology has been most consistently expressed by the Green Party platform (Sanders watered it down, twice). They’ve lots of problems. But, they’re incredibly loyal to the platform.

          If the Green Party gets 5% of the general election vote then they’ll be on every ballot in '28. The Democrats can’t silence the platform choice in primaries as they did twice to Sanders. This would place an incredible amount of pressure on Democrats immediately and be passively sustained for four years.

          In a purple state I’d vote Democrat POTUS for harm reduction. In a blue state it’d depend on the situation. But, in a red state, I risk absolutely nothing by not for voting harm reduction.

          We’re the only ones completely free to act for the long term. The blue wave thinks we’re too stupid to understand nuance. Political parties don’t deserve your loyalty. We need be loyal to each other, especially when we’re hated for our choices.

          • Dkarma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            This message is hated because it is false and naive and helps Republicans.

      • ski11erboi@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        4 months ago

        Just saw Oklahoma has one of the lowest voter turn outs in the nation. With Tulsa and Oklahoma city it’s more progressive than most people realize. We’ve just got to get out and vote and convince those around us to do the same. I know we have the numbers to win local elections.

        • zaph
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Just saw Oklahoma has one of the lowest voter turn outs in the nation.

          Probably because you’re not allowed to vote if someone from your party isn’t running. We have a county sheriff race that was just decided by drawing a name out of a hat. Dems didn’t get a vote.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Lots of downticket races can be swung by a popular presidential nominee.

        That said, Oklahoma’s awash in O&G money and its state bureaucrats are notoriously corrupt. At some point, the sheer volume of gerrymandering, vote caging, and criminal disenfranchisement needs to be addressed. Simply shouting at people to “GO VOTE!” when they’re getting handed broken machines and defective butterfly ballots and threatening robocalls isn’t helping anyone, least of all the candidates they’re hoping will win.

      • MerrySkeptic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Good for you. It may not mean anything for national elections but it could make a difference in a local one

      • SirDerpy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        This sub hates the following message. That’s why it comes today instead of yesterday.

        Focus on loyalty to ideology, not party affiliation. Left ideology has been most consistently expressed by the Green Party platform (Sanders watered it down, twice). They’ve lots of problems. But, they’re incredibly loyal to the platform.

        If the Green Party gets 5% of the general election vote then they’ll be on every ballot in '28. The Democrats can’t silence the platform choice in primaries as they did twice to Sanders. This would place an incredible amount of pressure on Democrats immediately and be passively sustained for four years.

        In a purple state I’d vote Democrat POTUS for harm reduction. In a blue state it’d depend on the nuance of the situation. But, in a red state, I risk absolutely nothing by not for voting harm reduction.

        We’re the only ones completely free to act for the long term. The blue wave thinks we’re too stupid to understand nuance. Political parties don’t deserve your loyalty. We need be loyal to each other, especially when we’re hated for our choices.

        • Dkarma@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          There is no way the greens can get to 270. You’re suggesting progressives split the Dem vote.

          This is a sure way to lose for Dems and progressives.

          The way to move the party left is with money and primaries not the general election.

  • razorwiregoatlick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    I know the top comments in these subs is always something along the lines of “fuck the polls! Go vote!” I agree but damn it is nice to get some positive news now and then!

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    As with all the discussions on national polls, it’s necessary to point out that national polls have no meaning. We don’t have national elections.

    Blue states are gonna blue state and red states are gonna red state, so the President will be decided by a handfull of states that don’t reliably vote one way or another, and frankly, we just don’t have enough good data on a Harris nomination to say one way or another.

    Looking at the notable states I’ve looked at before, this data is from before Biden dropped out.

    Arizona - Trump +6 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/arizona/

    Nevada - Trump +10 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/nevada/

    New Mexico - No data for Harris.

    Georgia - Trump +5 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/georgia/

    North Carolina - Trump +4 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/north-carolina/

    Pennsylvania - Trump +4 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/pennsylvania/

    Michigan - Trump +5 vs Harris
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/michigan/

    Wisconsin - Tied.
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/wisconsin/

    Minnesota - No data for Harris.
    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/minnesota/

    Harris also puts Virginia in play now as well, in what was assumed to be a blue state, now Trump +4.

    https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-general/2024/virginia/

    So this is her starting point. She has 105 days to turn this around. The Democratic convention in August is key.

    As of right now though? Here’s the map:

    • Natanael@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Those polls don’t account for anything that happened after the switch, like the impact of the record number of donations and news blitz. Need to wait for the next round before we really have any idea, and a few more in a few weeks to see where it levels off

        • Donebrach@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          this is the bottom

          What does that even mean? You sure spent a lot of energy spreading completely useless and out of date information.

          • jordanlund@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            It’s what we have and it’s Harris’ starting point.

            Where she goes from here? 🤷‍♂️ But if we don’t track what we have NOW, we won’t be able to see how she improves (or doesn’t) a week from now, a month from now, or two months from now.

            When we get another “national polling suggests…” article in October, it will be interesting to re-run the stats and compare them to this. They should be VASTLY different.

            But what makes it interesting is the progress she makes between now and then.

    • MehBlah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      So ESPN favors trump is what you are saying. That site is owned by them. Always look at the bias.

      • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        They’re aggregating polls with a public methodology. Just because an organization exists doesn’t mean it is pushing a bias in everything it does. If you’re going to claim a bias point it out, say what they are doing to bias the results, you can’t infer it from results.

        • MehBlah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You can’t get anything unbiased if the site is owned by a huge corporation. You can get that fantasy out of your head. That site is nothing but polls by disney.

          • OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            But it’s polls by everyone.

            And yes you CAN get unbiased information from a huge corporation. Do you have a weather app? Book publishers are corporations, are Earth Science textbooks biased for one political candidate?

            I’m not saying they CANT be biased, I’m saying you do need literally any evidence before just asserting that they are.

            • MehBlah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              On the surface but I hardly am going to trust something that is run by disney.

            • MehBlah@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              They are biased not because the aggregate but because they limit reviews. Who uses them? People who can form their own opinions of what they like.

        • MehBlah@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Entertainment news is pretty much all we have left. All of them are geared toward getting views and ratings. I have zero trust these days. I’m hardly ever surprised when some new corruption comes out and how quickly it disappears behind a cacophony of crap that doesn’t matter to me in the least. When people constantly stand on poll data that in my 53 years I’ve never been asked to participate in any poll. I’m pretty sure I am in no way unique so I figure polls are targeted for a result and I’m not a part of the process. I’m just supposed to be a consumer.

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    4 months ago

    i’m going to need so much popcorn to watch GOP squirming and flailing desperate to find something to attack LOL

    she’s too OLD!!!

    hunter’s laptop!!!

    buttery males!!!

    LOL

    eat shit, republicans

  • barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    4 months ago

    That’s good news but still too close. We all need to continue informing the public that Donald is a dementia-ridden geriatric physically and mentally unfit for the office.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Her polls before Biden did the right thing were lower. She has upward momentum. Biden had downward momentum.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      Popularity I’m afraid.

      Other polls that factor in additional considerations essentially have them neck-and-neck right now, maybe a 1 or 2% lead for Trump.

      Fucking electoral college…

    • Zipitydew
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah I want to know specifically about say Ohio, Wisconsin, Arizona, etc. I know Harris will win all along the coasts. But that’s only 175 of 270.

    • VanillaBean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yeah this is always the thing people forget… we have this antiquated electoral college thing.

  • Optional@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    1.) POLLS ARE GARBAGE.

    2.) Corporate news cannot run a horse race without polls

    3.) See #1

  • nifty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Polls mean nothing, the trends on polls aren’t guaranteed if people get complacent and don’t turn out. Voter apathy is the worst thing that can happen to Dems in this election

  • DarkCloud@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    4 months ago

    Project 2025 mentions Trump’s name 300 times. Officials from his administration were involved in writing it. It’s a plan to replace public servants with “Trump loyalist” - which Trump calls “destroying the deep state” but is actually know as “Unitary Executive Theory”, aka a dictatorship.

    In 2018, The Heritage Foundation said on their website, that two-thirds of the previous “Mandate for Leadership” they wrote for Trump had been passed into law. They’re a big part of how the GOP sets policy when in office, dating back to the Reagan era.