• xantoxis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    On the one hand, a sign like this definitely did have enough room for the full spelling of “through”. There seems to be no reason to abbreviate it.

    On the other hand, isn’t drive-thru just, like, its own noun now? Part of me thinks this was always spelled correctly.

  • Drusas@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Don’t get me started on “donut” instead of “doughnut”.

  • optional
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Wy do yu insist so strongly on writing thre mor letters that do nothing to chang the pronunciaton of the word? Ar yu French?

    • funnystuff97@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      5 months ago

      If ther’s on thing I hat, it’s words ending with silent e’s. And whil we’r at it, we ned to get rid of doubl e’s as well.

      • Nelots@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t mind silent e’s, they do actually change the way words are pronounced at least.

        • eatham 🇭🇲@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          They work like an e after a vowel, making it a long vowel, but with a letter in between. They have absolutely no reason to exist as haet is pronounced the same as hate but has the letters in a more logical order.

        • thetreesaysbark
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          Magic Es they taught them to me as. Come to think of it as an adult a magic e could mean something entirely different…

        • optional
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          If they are silent, they don’t chang the pronunciaton, becaus if they do they are not silent.

          • Nelots@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            In that persons comment, they removed several “silent” e’s, but all but one changed the word’s pronunciation. I was talking about them. Like the E in hate. It doesn’t make a sound itself, so isn’t it still silent?

            • optional
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s not silent, but in the wrong place. Haet would be more correct, as it changes the pronunciation from [hæt] to [heɪt]. Hait might be an even better way to write it (see also: bait, maid, laid etc.)

              English is a weird language.

              • bleistift2@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                English is three languages wearing a trench coat and pretending to be one.

                [Off topic:]

                I just now realized that the word “trench” is in “trench coat”.

                […] heavy-duty fabric,[1] originally developed for British Army officers before the First World War, and becoming popular while used in the trenches, hence the name trench coat.

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trench_coat

      • optional
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Dubl e’s mak sens thou. Ther’s a diffrenc between feed and fed, or between need and Ned. The dublin maks the E longer.

          • optional
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            So we should write fiid and niid then? In German, if you wanted a word that’s pronounced like the English need, you’d write nied.

            Anyhow, just removing the second e without replacement would not help in knowing how to pronounce the word by reading it.

            • rautapekoni@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Nah, let the native speakers decide how they want to write their language. I just wanted to take a bit of a jab towards how messed up their vowels are.

  • Enzy@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Americans don’t like “ou” in their words.

    So it is thereby, by law, and without question, “Drive throgh”.

  • Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    If you want to be more accurate it is a Drive Next to, unless you drive through the building to get your food.

    Oil change places where you don’t get out of your car are drive through, everywhere else is a drive next to.

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    For a moment, I thought, this was a misprint and they had to officially get out a spray can to complete the word…

  • linuxgator@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    5 months ago

    Loved the show Dress to Kill by Eddie Izzard. He thought thru was much better than through coming to the conclusion that through should be pronounced like thruff.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      My father used to tell me that ghoti was pronounced “fish.”

      GH as in rough,

      O as in women,

      TI as in ration.

      • merc
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        That’s not how any of that works.

          • merc
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            No it isn’t. The letters “gh” doesn’t make the “f” sound without the full “ough”, you can’t just take some of the letters out. Same with the “ti” in “tion”. In addition, words trace their pronunciation from their origin. Words ending in “tion” are latin-derived, and shares an origion with “sion” (Mission, passion) and cion (suspicion). The reason that “ough” sometimes has an “f” sound is that originally it had a glottal stop, like the word “loch” in Scottish, but over time that glottal stop slipped and became an “f”.

            The point is, while certain letter sequences have surprising pronunciations in English, you can’t just take those weird pronunciations out of context and create a new word. And you certainly can’t say that “ghoti” is pronounced “fish”.

  • notsure@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    there are two “l”'s in cancelled, i will die on this hill…/s

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Kinda sad where you live in a state where every little misspelling or mangled punctuation causes such stress.

  • tacosanonymous@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thru /throo͞/

    preposition, adverb & adjective

    1. Through.

    preposition

    1. Alternative spelling of through.

    The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition • More at Wordnik

    • Anyolduser@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      5 months ago

      Just a quick reminder that dictionaries are descriptive, they document existing language use rather than set down rules.

      If enough people break an existing rule often enough, it makes it into dictionaries. Just ask anyone who doesn’t think that “ironic” should mean “coincidental”.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I should thank her for writing such a boring, tedious book filled with “old man yells at cloud” energy that it started me on the path away from prescriptivism.

        • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe I just had different expectations. I really thought it would have interesting things to say about grammar, but it was just her complaining about the same surface-level type of thing over and over. I guess I just wasn’t expecting something meant to be popular instead of substantive after the hype I’d heard around it-- guess I didn’t look enough into what it was beforehand.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            That would be different for sure. I just went into it hoping for something light and amusing about punctuation, so I wasn’t disappointed.

    • merc
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      If we’re going to be consistent with other elements, it should be Aluminum, that way it matches Molybdenum and Platinum, the only 2 other elements ending in “um” (please don’t check this).