• FunkyMonk@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    174
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    You had me till the BuY AnOthER OnE, Pay me imaginary strawman. I do love bikes though, so do the fuckers that keep taking mine.

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    With trains, you don’t arrive sweaty, you can’t get run down by cars, and someone else parks it

    • adriaan
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      86
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I ride a bike to work every day. I’m never sweaty. The infrastructure to cycle exists so I won’t get run over by cars.

        • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Where I live (Oklahoma City), I wouldn’t want to bike for at least 5 months of the year. Between mid April and late October, we are stupid hot and humid. We had lots of days this past summer that either got uncomfortably close to or passed 40°C. Dew points in the mid 20s all summer long. You’ll break a sweat just standing outside for more than about a minute or two.

          Can’t imagine what it’s like for those sorry saps in Houston or Florida.

          • pearable@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The comfortable temp for biking is significantly higher than it is for walking, especially with the right gear. 40°C is definitely beyond reasonable tho. Planting trees and decreasing the amount of asphalt would go a long way to make it a better proposition more of the year. A societal expectation that you don’t go or do anything when weather gets that hot could bridge the difference. Unfortunately that kind of philosophy is antithetical to capitalism’s demands for productivity.

        • CurlyMoustache@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I live in a somewhat hilly city. That is why I have an electric bike. I’m never sweaty when I arrive at work

          • Chriswild@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            1 year ago

            Even if the city is flat as fuck you’ll still arrive sweaty if the climate is hot. Take Phoenix for example, you will sweat even if you are in the shade and doing no physical exercise because it’s commonly 46 degrees.

            • adriaan
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Phoenix is not a great example of how we should design cities. Putting a city in a desert is a bad idea from the outset.

              • Chriswild@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                The desert is the only reason it is habitable, if it were less arid the humidity would make it even worse. The largest desert on earth is Antarctica, deserts don’t have to be hot, just low precipitation.

                But what deserts do very well is solar potential due to lack of cloud cover and I don’t know why we can’t use solar to power electric rail for public transportation.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have an electric bike for the hills.

          Where I used to work it was downhill all the way there and uphill all the way back stupid way round of having it don’t want to get to work early.

        • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Hills are only the problem if you’re not biking regularly. I’m way out of shape, but after a year on living in a country with good infrastructure, hills aren’t a problem for me anymore, really. But first couple of months it was a bit brutal, for sure.

          • pearable@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Biking in the cold and wet honestly isn’t that bad. Biking is my primary way of getting around all year in the PNW. When it gets real cold I put on normal snow gear. It definitely makes going outside more of a production tho.

            A lot of it has more to do with what people are used to and feel is reasonable than with the actual conditions. If people saw more folks riding and actually knew people who rode I think people would be more open to try it.

            Unmanaged ice/snow, unhealthy wet bulb temperatures, and getting run over due to car first infrastructure are the most significant barriers to more people using bikes as transportation IMO. If a society chooses to, all those things can be mitigated.

            My favorite part of riding is that I get moderate physical activity for free. I would not spend near as much time being active otherwise.

      • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        1 year ago

        Teach me the non-sweaty ways. I love my bike, but theres no way I can arrive not sweaty. Before you say go slow, I’m not letting no bus take my god-damn glory.

          • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Sure, but I assume the conversation was about mechanical bikes. Personally, for a PEV I would choose something lighter and cheaper and forego the pedalling altogether, but my commute is only about 7.5 km one way.

          • anivia@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            In Germany those are only allowed to assist you up to 25kph, which means they only help you going up hills, everywhere else will be the same amount of effort

        • pearable@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          An Ebike is extremely helpful, especially if there are hills. Wear a breathable long sleeve SPF shirt. I like hemp and some of the stuff Colombia makes. If your route is safe enough don’t wear a helmet. Shorts and sandals are also helpful. I’ve had some success with lightweight merino clothes as well but they tend to get holey in a few years of frequent use

        • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You just don’t treat it as a competition, but as a relaxed stroll. Don’t care about any buses, just vibe with the flow.

          • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thats the thing though, for me the flow to vibe with is some banger tunes and pedalling as hard as I can. 😅

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          When I biked to work there was a YMCA right next to my office, so I would ride in early, get in a workout and a shower at the Y and then walk two minutes to work. The only downsides were 1) getting chased by pitbulls and 2) having to look at fat old judges lounging around the locker room stark naked before starting their day of sending probably-innocent black men to prison for decades (both hazards of life in Louisiana).

          • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Obviously I can shower at work but then I need to get in 15 minutes early and then I have to blow-dry my hair and it is just a whole thing now.

            You might not see the above as a problem but for me, the problem is I can for the life of me not get up earlier than I have to, I am just not a morning person. If I can manage to brew a pot of coffee and have a quick breakfast before I have to get out the door, that is a successfull morning.

          • adriaan
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No dude, two thirds of my office commutes in by bike. I’m just in decent shape and cycling at a reasonable pace doesn’t make me break a sweat. For most people in decent shape it doesn’t make you sweat more than walking.

    • nifty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I love trains but they give me so much anxiety. I have stories of facing harassment on public transport. But it’s not just me though, here’s some idea of why public transport can suck for women or other people in case my anecdotes are just that: https://www.metro-magazine.com/10111994/sexual-crime-and-harassment-on-public-transportation-a-study

      California had to make a law for race-based harassment, so it’s not just a one place or just sex-based harassment issue: https://19thnews.org/2023/02/california-introduces-bill-harassment-safety-public-transit-systems/

      If public transport can come without being subjected to people and whatever miserable state of mind they’re in, I’d like that. I can at least escape a dumbass in my car, but in a train they’re either right in front of me or nearby for a long time. How do we fix this?

      • SkepticalButOpenMinded@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Public transport is clean and safe when everyone uses it. In the US, the social expectation is that public transportation is for the poor. Like white flight out of US urban centers in the 60s, it’s a class thing, and owning a car becomes a self perpetuating class signifier. In most of the rest of the developed world, like London, Paris, Tokyo, etc. public transportation is for everyone, rich and poor. It’s just a question of investing in and valuing public transportation over cars.

        • nifty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hmm idk about cars as a class signifier, they’re like phones now, everyone has one. I don’t disagree with you about public transport being for everyone, but I am not sure that examples of harassment and human misery will necessarily decrease because richer people are forced to commute. See for example, the price-based communal vans in Asian countries. I think it makes sense to actively work on making public transit better, but that requires an open eyed approach to acknowledging existing problems. Nothing can have perfect solutions, but an attempt needs to be made to at least acknowledge the issue and provide a preliminary solution.

          • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            The reason you’re not afraid of being in public in any other circumstances are in public transportation is exactly, precisely because public transportation in US is shitty and stigmatized and the expectation is that only the poor are using it. This is the source of the problem, and the way to fix i is to improve it so everyone is using it, and the crowd in public transport will be the same as everywhere

            • nifty@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              The examples listed as better public transport still have the harassment and human misery issues. I don’t think it’s simply a matter of “get more people using it”. For one I think people who engage in harassment of any form should lose the privilege to use public transportation for a period of time, like we do with drunk drivers and their licenses. Or get them to go to classes like we do for road rage people. Maybe other countries are already doing this.

              • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                No, good public transportation will not eliminate all the misery in the people’s lives, but also it isn’t suppose to, and nothing will. Good public transportation however helps with making it the same level of misery as anywhere else, and usually even more. The particular issue of harassment isn’t an issue in a good public transportation, because there are people there, there are structures, there are authorities and systems that can help. And besides, it’s not like people just decide to harass other people the second they go into metro.

                • nifty@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  11 months ago

                  , because there are people there, there are structures, there are authorities and systems that can help.

                  Bystander effect is real, plenty of people have been harassed without the harasser facing any consequences. I think one improvement over our current system would be to disallow harassers the use of public transport for a period of time, or provide them with mental health help? I am not sure if it’s the best solution, but it’s kind of similar to what we do with people who drive drunk, or those who have to get anger management classes after road rage. Fines would also be a good idea.

                  An anecdote: there was a lady once on a subway platform who was yelling about colored people. She wasn’t bothering anyone in particular, though. There was at least one incident of someone stabbing and killing someone for defending minorities. These interactions are not safe for people and defenders alike. Moreover, you cannot react fast enough in some instances if someone wants to hurt you. For example, people have been pushed off train platforms. Regarding getting police help, if someone is walking around wearing a poster of “Christ hates gays” or something, the police might not do anything because of free speech laws (or because they agree sometimes).

                  These things are all kinda related, better housing policies lead to less homelessness and less instability, and therefore people with less mental issues. I don’t think simply having more efficient public transportation will make using public transport safer. Perfect solutions don’t exist, so at the very least I hope there are also anti-harassment policies like fines, losing privileges for a reasonable and proportionate amount of time, or having to take mandatory classes or providing mental health help for the harasser.

                  I want good public transportation as well, but for me the definition of good also includes having adequate safety measures.

                  That said, I really appreciate the passion some community members display for their topics of interest. What gets annoying for me though is what appears to be an utter lack of empathy or consideration for an alternative view. I think I am done, honestly—some people will think I am inconsiderate regardless of what I say. Whatever.

                  Here’s some news from places with great public transportation which supports my point that efficient does not equal safe:

                  1. from Japan: https://tankenjapan.com/how-common-is-chikan-unwanted-touching-on-trains-in-japan/

                  2. From 6 days ago: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c8829ked1x3o

                  3. on buses, https://tfl.gov.uk/corporate/publications-and-reports/bus-crime-statistics

                  4. from Germany: https://www.thelocal.de/20230301/which-german-train-stations-have-the-highest-crime-rates

                  Note that I am not using one-off incidences as examples, but what you’d expect to be routine crime on a given day.

      • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You can also do this thing called walking. Although I am aware that in the United States that is considered suspicious behavior.

          • pearable@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The public transit isn’t that great where I live by European standards. I use a Brompton folding bike to make up the difference. It’s great for trains

      • Facebones@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is my favorite argument from carfolk, because they’ll treat walking one block from a bus station as some cardinal sin but will happily walk four blocks from a parking spot.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Cities with transit typically have several different ways of getting around.

        For my last job, som e choices were:

        • express bus plus walk a couple blocks
        • train and walk a mile
        • train to subway and walk a couple blocks
        • drive to subway and walk a couple blocks
        • train to subway to another subway into basement of my building

        I’m not even counting scooter and bike share but I chose each of these options depending g on what was best at the time. But my most common choice was the train and walk a mile. It was a bit of a walk but I didn’t have to deal with people or waiting and it was close enough. But maybe you prefer walking less or like the scooter or bike shares: great, make the choice that’s best for you

        Edit to add: for those unfamiliar with transit - every place will be different but I paid a monthly train pass based on my distance from the city. That pass included unlimited express buses, and unlimited subway rides within the city. So much freedom and convenience! One monthly fee let me go anywhere in the city, so much cheaper and easier than dealing with a car!

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Japanese used bikes to defeat the British in Singapore. The Vietnamese used bikes to defeat the Americans in Vietnam. The Chinese used bikes to destroy manufacturing in the west.

    I’ll be in the cold cold ground before I use some stupid commie machine powered by rice.

    All other arguments for not using a bike are stupid.

    • Naich@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      141
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      As soon as bicycles are mentioned, everyone suddenly has to transport their washing machine 200 miles in sub zero temperatures.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it’s more that when someone is suggesting something as a perfect thing, people naturally try to challenge that by finding faults in it.

        • Naich@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s blindingly obvious cycling is not a panacea for all transport and no one is suggesting it is. Yet here they are, all pointing out what everyone knows in response to a statement that was never made.

          • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s like you don’t read your peers comments. Yes, people argue this ALL THE TIME.

            If I had a dime every time someone said oh just rent a truck when you need it making blind assumptions about my life and what I need, I could buy a bike with it.

            • Naich@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes, people argue all the time and say exactly the same stupid things all the time and it gets really tedious.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think you’re getting too upset about that. That’s just how people argue online.

      • SeekPie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Glad that my city has a cargo bike renting program for 10€/day or 25€/week up to 4 weeks (selection from 17: 15 electric, 2 acoustic)

        • DoomsdaySprocket@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I would take the acoustic, then I wouldn’t have to supply my own cards to put in the spokes every time!

          Seriously though cargo bike rental sounds like a pipe dream, too bad they roads where I am wouldn’t be able to handle such a thing by design!

  • redhydride@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Screw that. I love paying for car insurance, gas, oil change, tires, and random bolts maintenance. There is also the thrill of driving in traffic, and dealing with road rage. There is plenty that makes the car the ideal transportation mode loved by the masses.

    • RacerX@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      My personal favorite is how if someone bumps you and you get the smallest scratch or dent on your door, you now have to be late for whatever you were doing, pull over (impacting other traffic) exchange insurance info deal with possible hostility for that and ultimately have a crappy day because of it.

    • porthos@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How about the fact that cars are so complicated now that working on them yourself feels next to impossible but you also have to somehow find mechanics that you trust to fix your vehicle when you really have no objective way to know if the mechanics are just bullshitting you or are actually genuinely investigating the problem, not just tossing away what you are saying with a mental note that you are clueless. Fixing a bicycle on the other hand is almost comically simple in comparison.

      Also can’t forget the thrill that it only takes a second or two of distraction at the wrong moment to kill yourself and other innocent people and irrevocably send your life down a worse path. To be clear, this experience is happening when you are tired, grumpy and stressed about getting to work or getting back from work. It’s a nice little detail that we aren’t all driving boats around or something where hitting other boats requires a bunch of really stupid choices chained together, all we have to do in a car is go slightly in the wrong direction for 3 seconds and boom just murdered somebodies kid.

  • (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    73
    arrow-down
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Every time I see this kind of post I just wish they would try to go to work in a +40 degree Celsius environment.

    It must be nice to work in a place that won’t mind if you arrive drenched in sweat.

    Edit: I love the hive mind

    • Herobrine gaming@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It would be one thing if all employers offered locker rooms and adequate time to get ready along with safe storage.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        adequate time to get ready

        But doesn’t that depend on you? If you arrive earlier you have more time

        • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t get paid to arrive earlier, so it’s gonna depend on them for me dawg

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would’ve figured work starts once you’re ready for work. If that includes showering and you need more time for that, you should come earlier so you can shower.

            To me it’s no different from taking the time to shower at home. You can sleep later if you don’t shower but I take the time. No pay for that though.

            • Kalothar@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              While I was mostly joking with my comment and the context of having to bike to work in a hot climate.

              I agree with you initially, that works starts when you’re ready to work. I think that definition of ready is a little subjective.

              As far as I’m concerned the moment I deviate from my normal non-working behavior is when I am starting work.

              Realistically I feel that begins at the commute to work for me, I have some personal bias here since I have an hour long commute when I do. I work from home a lot of the time, so again that also skews my perception of when I “start” work.

    • silasmariner@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It must be nice to work in a place that won’t mind if you arrive drenched in sweat.

      coughs nervously in works-from-home

      But yeah, it’s more weather dependent for sure

      • Sanyanov@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Remote jobs are unironically super good for environment, aside from all other amazing advantages they offer.

        • Ironfist
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          BuT WhAt aBoUt cOlLaBoRaTiOn? - some boomer executive somewhere

    • dlhextall
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Honestly, no matter the mode of transportation, I’d arrive drenched in sweat in a 40° environment.

      • Faresh@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would probably not even step outside unless absolutely necessary. At that temperature I would already suffer indoors, and if I stepped out I’d faint if I stayed out there for longer than thirty minutes.

    • abuttandahalf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here in Palestine people drive bikes the most in the hottest city, Jericho. It reaches 40 degrees there. An ebike would make you get less hot from exertion. In combination with good urban planning with small streets and trees and buildings creating lots of shade it’s workable. It’s not sustainable to have air conditioned cars transport people everywhere. This is what living in a hot climate means.

    • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tbf you could just take a shower at workplace after the commute, assuming you have showers at work.

        • reev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably more if cities were designed around bicycles in the way they currently are around cars.

          • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 year ago

            +the fact that some other people do Real Work^TM where you get dirty and shit and need to have shower before going home. Factories and shit.

        • 9point6@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think even at the smallest company I’ve worked at, there was a shower in the building that people working at the companies there could use. First time I’ve really thought about it, but I guess it would be odd if a place didn’t have at least one shower somewhere for the cyclists and runners. (I’m working in a British city for context)

        • uis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          How many people actually have car storage(called parking spot by some idiot, although there are no trees) in their workplace?

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where do you live that it’s 40+ degrees at ~8am in the morning, the entire year round?

      Or could you simply be looking for an excuse?

        • pfjarschel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Also Brazil

          Edit: not to mention the flash-flooding thunderstorms, tree-shattering winds, and so, so many hills.

      • Kepabar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most tropical/subtropical areas will have a heat index in this range for the majority of the year thanks to humidity.

        I live in Florida and maybe for two months of the year I could cycle around without getting soaked, either by rain or humidity.

        I do cycle around for fun though.

      • MindSkipperBro12@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Not everyone lives in sunny California, some people live in the perpetual 100% humidity tropical climate.

        Also screw second and third shifters, right?

        • emergencyfood
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I live in a ‘perpetual 100% humidity tropical climate’. 8am would be 20-22 degrees. Afternoons would be hot though.

    • weeeeum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or underdeveloped infrastructure that forces you to bike on the road. There’s this road near my house thats like a quarter mile long and its 40mph and people usually speed up to 65mph.

      Trying to get to work on my bike with that is fucking suicide, and my work is only a mile away.

      Even walking is excrutiating. The weather is very cold, which is fine since it’s only a mile, but the busy roads you need to cross make you wait so damn much. Waiting for the signal to walk is about 5 minutes. There are 5 busy crosswalks that turn my 10 minute walk into a 35 minute walk in the freezing fucking cold.

      Yeah you could jaywalk but you can be arrested and trying to jaywalk a road with cars going 60 is like Russian roulette.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah you could jaywalk but you can be arrested

        How?

        and trying to jaywalk a road with cars going 60 is like Russian roulette.

        So, 60 units of imperialism is about 96 units of true freedom. How the fuck your city allows it?

        • weeeeum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          In most places jaywalking is a civil infraction resulting in only a fine (I can impede traffic and increase potential for injuries). In those places you cant be arrested.

          In others you can be arrested then charged with criminal misdemeanor. If very serious (not sure what defines that) you can also get a felony.

          Either way it’s punishable, and I don’t want to do that when most of the crosses are within line of sight of the local police station.

          About that road Im not really sure why the limit is specifically 40, since roads that cross it are 20, and also that it has no sidewalk but leads to residential areas. You can’t even walk on the grass there’s a bridge that forces you onto the road.

          There is another road but it’s half a mile longer (1.1km) and also it has the busiest street near my house. I swear to god the pedestrian walk lights are broken because I sat my freezing ass next to that damn thing for 20 minutes before just jaywalking anyways (also scared cause that roads also a 40mph).

          I really wish I could walk, for my health for the environment but ironic as it would be I’m not gonna die for my health lol.

    • Erismi14@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      So let’s build more urban heat islands and parking lots. Exactly what a +40 C environment needs. Biking might be unpleasant in 40 C weather, and the cyclist might get a bit sweaty, but all of the positives are true. And cars are just going to make the planet hotter.

    • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Have you considered, that different places need different infrastructure?

      I might also remark, that your houses are utterly unprepared for the -5C where I’m at currently, but that would be stupid.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      While taking your kid on a 10km detour to the only child care center thats anywhere near your home or work that has availability. And dont forget to swing by the shops and grab milk on the way home.

      • SolarNialamide@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s an urban planning problem. My dad’s detour to drop me off at daycare when I was little was a 10 minute bike ride. When I was old enough to go to school, there was no detour because it was on the way to his work. Shops are also on the way or at most a 5 minute detour.

      • zeekaran@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sounds like you live in a car dependent city. Imagine if it were built for walking or biking. Everything you need within 15 minutes walking rather than 15 minutes driving. Just try imagining it.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        While taking your kid on a 10km detour to the only child care center thats anywhere near your home or work that has availability.

        Imagine living in ex-USSR country. Daycares everywhere.

  • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Moved to the suburbs in my 30s. Got a new bike to hit the nearby bike trails. First bike ride turns into agonizing ordeal as it literally feels like someone ripped open my knees and poured broken glass in them. Diagnosed with arthritis in my knees.

    There are plenty of reasons people don’t use bikes, and health reasons are one of the main ones.

  • Maggoty@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Distance. An hour commute or a 20 minute trip to the grocery store. We killed walkable neighborhoods so now here we are. Trapped.

    • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Start yelling at your city legislators then. Force them to change how the city zones so things are closer together. It will take a couple decades of work, but you have to be apart of that change for it to happen.

    • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      You can do what I did and move to another country. It just takes a lot of time, work, and money to get there (though money can accelerate the former two, in some cases).

  • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    Bruh I live 26 miles from where I work by car, and 21 miles by biking per Google Maps. And most of it is highway travel. It would make my commute over 1.5 hrs.

    It is the dream if/when we can move closer though.

    • pseudo@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      if entire cities were designed around these the way they are with cars, everyone would be fine with it and you would live less than 6 miles from where you work.

      • uis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Public Transport

        EDIT: looking back it seems I replied to wrong comment

        • pseudo@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Indeed. Maybe not even me.

          But there is plenty of way to work from more remote or rural area. I could list some if you feel like reading a bit longer.
          As for people who live very far from any human, why do that if it is to drive hours and hours a day into busier area?

    • Erismi14@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You may live in a place that is the result of building car dependent infrastructure. To achieve a “bike city” op is describing, it would take decades, if not a century in your area for it to make sense to just bike everywhere. It takes time.

      • ZOSTED
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s why you start small, and work up incrementally. Bike lanes are the first step: just make it possible. Next is paths that cut across town to allow bikes (and pedestrians) to avoid roads altogether. Just put them in wherever you can. Eventually you can start connecting them, and gradually it starts to make sense to say “let’s just walk there” or “I’ll meet you there on my bike.”

        It’s literally just paint and gravel, and micro zoning. But it helps every step of the way, and it adds up quickly.

      • AquaTofana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh it is. It’s exploded like CRAZY in the past 10 years and it just keeps expanding outward instead of upward. City planners definitely designed this place to be the epitome of “urban sprawl”.

        For real though, if I had it my way, we’d live within 5-8 miles of where I work and I’d bike every day it wasn’t raining.

        Next duty station though! We’re gonna buy/rent closer to the base, wherever that is!

      • pearable@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        An excellent bike city is a long process but there’s a lot of simple stuff that could help folks cut down on car trips. Imminent domain a few side yards and put in walking and bike paths to make neighborhoods more walkable. Knock down some houses to put in corner stores with apartments on top. If you build dedicated bus lanes, light rail, and bicycle paths you’re on a road to a safer and more connected city.

    • ZombiFrancis
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Already fairly interesting how you can still manage to save five miles by bike in a system designed for cars.

      • lingh0e
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Biking would add two miles onto my commute.

        • ZombiFrancis
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s more like it.

          Mine would be identical because its just the same roads.

          • ZOSTED
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Since we’re just sharing anecdotes: I save some time when commuting to my gym, because there’s a path through a bunch of greenery in some public back lot community…greenery area type…thing. Anyway, it’s nice, and the city just put it up a few years ago! I didn’t care at first, but now I take it several times a week.

            Also driving a car to the gym only to get on a stationary bike or treadmill there just feels hilariously braindead to me.

    • Ragdoll X@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bikes + Metro would be the ideal

      But that would require politicians who aren’t in the pockets of oil billionaires

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but the hypothetical is if there was better biking infrastructure and I suppose that would include not expecting people to travel so far to work.

      Again if it was better public transport infrastructure you could take public transit and wouldn’t need the car the problem is that these improvements have never been made.

    • ZOSTED
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well yeah that’s for a big ol artery - that’s never going away, but within-region is different.

      Like I’m not going to take a bike to go visit my brother in the town over. That’s just not appropriate use of the tech

  • Ruscal
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    No need for parking

    Yeah, just look how Nederlands or Belgium looks like xD

    • frunch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Rookie numbers.

      Have you ever seen a walmart parking lot in person? You can fit the Netherlands and part of Belgium in one.

    • Luminocta @lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m Dutch and live rural. Used to cycle to school daily, 22km per day.

      Never again. I need a car for work as I visit clients alot. I think cities could use bike friendly environments, like we have. But rural, no way. Good luck cycling 2 hours to get somewhere decent if you can drive that in half an hour.

      It simply costs too much time, and with the amount of wind and rainfall we had past year is absolutely no fun.

      • _NoName_@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah, rural areas will pretty much always need cars or something similar - not just for traversing the massive gaps between places, but also because most rural homes are their own logistics for most things.

        It also doesn’t help that this conversation itself is a pretty America-centric one. In the US and Canada, dense urbanism does not exist outside of major cities. NotJustBikes on YouTube has many videos talking about just how car-centric and space-inefficient it is here.

    • Tar_Alcaran
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have some big parking areas and garages specifically for bikes, especially at train stations, schools, city centres, etc. But at home, you don’t need a lot of parking space

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least in Finland apartment buildings have “parking” for bikes in the sense that there’s bike racks in front of staircases and usually a storage room specifically for bikes. “No need for parking” seems incorrect, even though it takes much, much less space than cars

        • adriaan
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Pretty much no one parks their bikes inside in the Nerherlands, I’m guessing that’s a climate thing. It takes like half a square meter outside.

          • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The indoors bike storage room is for winter (and other longer term) storage so you don’t have to leave them out in the elements and don’t have to bring them inside the apartment either. It can be handy.

            It takes like half a square meter outside

            It does add up in bigger apartment buildings. Nothing compared to cars but if you don’t factor it in during construction it can be annoying as shit.

    • Vincent@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Now imagine if all those bikes were cars.

      (You definitely do need bike-specific parking when you get to those numbers though. And other good infrastructure, though it’s rather the other way around: you need the good infrastructure to get to those numbers.)

    • minibyte
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or erectile dysfunction for that matter.

      • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The opposite of that, actually, prolonged sitting on your ass without much movement linked to all sorts of problems down there

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    "Cars are freedom! *

    Except for the monthly finance payment, the legal obligation to insurance companies, the dependance on oil companies, etc"

  • M500@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would love it if my city had bike only days. Or at least specific bike route that do not allow cars.

    I don’t live in the us and there is a major road in my city that has a bike lane, but they just split one of the car lanes so there is a bike lane, half a lane for a car, and a full lane.

    So cars have no choice but to drive in the bike lane. It’s also between the cars and a place with tons of right turns.

    In addition to this, the city has some of the worst traffic in the world short distances can take hours. But it’s too dangerous to ride a bike.

    • papalonian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      but they just split one of the car lanes so there is a bike lane, half a lane for a car, and a full lane.

      This is brilliant. Imagine their surprise when cars did not shrink to accommodate the change.

      • M500@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah! I just started driving in the country and stuff like that’s been really confusing for me. I feel bad, but there really is nowhere else to drive and merging is really hard due to all the motorcycles swerving around.

    • Railison@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      IIRC Bogotá did this and might still do it. They were called cyclovias or something similar

  • jaschen@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Here is another reason. I can’t afford a reasonable sized apartment that can house my family near my work. So I have to travel further. Bikes are great for cities if you can afford to live in the city.

    Also, what happens when it snows and you gotta get to work? Snow chains?